A number of U.S. states have laws that would ‘trigger’ a ban on abortion if Roe v. Wade was overturned

On Monday, Politico reported that the U.S. Supreme Court could intend to overturn the historic Roe v. Wade, who obtained a draft opinion from most of the pending sentencing. The high court is expected to announce its decision in the next two months, a ruling on a Mississippi case that seeks to ban most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

The draft opinion is genuine, said Chief Justice John Roberts a statement on Tuesday, as he ordered an investigation into how the document was leaked. Roberts said the document “does not represent a decision of the Court or the final position of any member on the issues in the case.” Roberts called the leak a “betrayal of the Court’s confidences.”

Abortion laws vary by state. Some states require abortion seekers to wait a minimum period of time between face-to-face counseling and their procedure, a measure that advocates deem necessary to ensure women are 100% sure they want to have an abortion. procedure. Opponents say the wait has been shown to lead to riskier abortions in the second quarter.

“Most states restrict abortion at a specific time during pregnancy, which usually lasts 40 weeks since the last menstrual period (LMP). In recent years, however, some state policymakers have tried to challenge it. of the Supreme Court banning abortion before viability, “said the Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive health think tank that supports abortion rights.

Clinic regulations and “trigger laws”

Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming have laws that would “activate” the abortion ban if the sentence were overturned. Meanwhile, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, West Virginia, and Wisconsin have laws prohibiting abortion before and / or after Roe v. Wade.

Many Republican states have focused on regulating clinics as a way to limit access to abortion. “Some 23 states have laws or policies that regulate abortion providers … all apply to clinics that perform surgical abortions, while 13-state regulations apply to doctors’ offices where abortions are performed.” , added the Guttmacher Institute.

These regulations imposed on both clinics and abortion providers include specifications that dictate the size of an abortion procedure room or the distance to a hospital facility, and requirements for abortion certifications. ‘a provider of abortions or hospital affiliations. Critics of these regulations argue that they go beyond the necessary patient safety measures.

C. Nicole Mason, president and CEO of the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, a nonprofit that supports abortion rights, said: “Many state legislatures are willing to ban abortion outright if Roe is suspended, leaving women in these states, especially low-income women and women of color, without access to these basic reproductive health services. “

Low-income women will be the worst offenders in Roe v. Wade, as they will be able to travel less to seek an abortion if they live in a state where access to abortion is restricted. About half of abortion women live below the federal poverty level, with 75% of them classified as low-income, compared to 27% in 2000.

The ramifications of a widespread ban on abortion go beyond the cost of an abortion, Mason said. “The potential overthrow of Roe will cause enormous damage to women’s equality,” she added. “But it will also dramatically affect women’s ability to participate fully in the U.S. economy by reducing their share of the workforce, reducing their income, and increasing their turnover.”

Different opinions about abortion

The anti-abortion group National Right to Life acknowledges that economic considerations are a factor for women seeking abortion, but says it is not a reason for termination. Republican lawmakers say they oppose “taxpayer-funded abortion,” and anti-abortion groups say unborn people have a right to life for moral and religious reasons.

Some advocates of abortion believe that abortion is wrong in any circumstance, while others believe it may be acceptable in cases of rape, incest, or cases where a woman’s life is at risk. Focus on the Family, a Colorado-based Christian ministry, says life begins at conception and equates the protection of the unborn with the protection of the physically and mentally handicapped.

Politicians, meanwhile, reacted to the leaked Supreme Court document, and their respective positions aligned with party lines. “Our daughters, sisters, mothers and grandmothers will not be silenced. The world is about to hear its fury. ” California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, wrote on Twitter. “California will not sit still. We will fight like hell.

Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey Republican he responded very differently to his fellow Democrats, blaming the leak of the court draft. “This unprecedented leak is worrying, outrageous and a blatant attempt to manipulate the sacred proceedings of the U.S. Supreme Court. Those responsible must be held accountable. My prayer is that Roe v. Wade is overthrown and that life prevails.”

Related: As American politics created a tribal culture on moral issues: “40 years ago, if I had told you that this person supports abortion, you wouldn’t know how he felt about taxes, health care, and immigration “

Source link

Leave a Reply