Every ISP in the US Must Block These 3 Pirate Streaming Services

A federal judge has ordered all U.S. Internet service providers to block three pirated streaming services operated by Doe defendants who never appeared in court and hid behind false identities.

Blocking orders affect Israel.tv, Israeli-tv.com, and Sdarot.tv, as well as the related domains listed in the resolutions and any other domains where copyright-infringing websites may reappear on future. The orders were filed in three essentially identical judgments (see here, here, and here) issued on April 26 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Each sentence provides a list of 96 ISPs that are expected to block websites, including Comcast, Charter, AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile. But the statements say that all ISPs must comply even if they are not on the list:

In addition, it is ordered that all ISPs (including, but not limited to, those listed in Appendix B) and any other ISPs serving in the United States will block access to the website at any address. of domain known today (including, among others, those that are established). in Annex A thereof) or to be used in the future by the defendants (“Recently Detected Websites”) by any technological means available on ISP systems. Recently detected domain addresses and websites must be channeled so that users cannot connect to and / or use the website, and will be diverted by ISP’s DNS servers to a landing page operated and controlled by ISPs. plaintiffs (the “Landing Page”).

This landing page is available here, citing “order to block all access to this website / service due to copyright infringement” by U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla.

“If you have been harmed in any way by the Court’s decision, you can file a motion in the Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York in the previous case,” the landing page also says.

“Go to great lengths to hide”

All three lawsuits were filed by Israeli film and television producers and suppliers against Doe defendants operating the websites. Each of the three sentences awarded $ 7.65 million in damages. TorrentFreak noted the sentences in an article Monday.

The orders also contain permanent precautionary measures against the defendants themselves and other types of companies that provided services to the defendants or could do so in the future. This includes companies like Cloudflare, GoDaddy, Google and Namecheap.

In all three cases, none of the defendants responded to the allegations or appeared in court, according to the judge’s rulings. “Defendants have done their utmost to conceal themselves and their illicit proceeds from the detection of the plaintiffs and this Court, including by using multiple false identities and addresses associated with their operations and contact information. intentionally misleading for the infringing website “, the resolutions say. .

Defendants are responsible for copyright infringement and violated the provision against the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), the judge wrote, describing the infringement as follows:

Through the website, the defendants have been retransmitting and streaming the original content of the plaintiffs, broadcast channels and television services that are only authorized for broadcasting and / or viewing in the territory of the State of ‘Israel and under a license. The infringing broadcast includes original content produced and owned by the plaintiffs, mostly in Hebrew, as well as major studies in the United States and elsewhere, licensed to the plaintiffs for broadcast exclusively in Israel (except the express license for broadcast in the United States).

Resolutions are more aimed at web hosts and banks

The plaintiffs are United King Film Distribution, DBS Satellite Services (1998), HOT Communication Systems, Reshet Media and Keshet Broadcasting. While the plaintiffs “transmit their programming in encrypted form,” the defendants’ “various services and hardware allow end consumers to avoid plaintiffs’ encryption to view plaintiffs’ content,” the judgments say.

The judge ordered the registrars and domain registrars to transfer the domain names to the plaintiffs. Sentences include lawsuits against “third parties providing services used in connection with defendant’s operations,” including web hosts, content delivery networks, DNS providers, VPN providers, web designers, search-based online advertising services And others.

Financial institutions face similar bans on doing business with blocked websites. The judgments point directly to the defendants’ monetary accounts, saying that the plaintiffs “shall have continued authority to notify this Order to any party that controls or otherwise has such accounts” until they have “recovered full payment from the defendants.” money owed by any Defendant under this Order. ”This applies to PayPal, banks, and payment providers in general.

This story originally appeared in Ars Technique.

Source link

Leave a Reply